Characteristics of Korean Patients with Constipation Who Visited a Tertiary Referral Center / 대한내과학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Korean patients with constipation have differences, both among themselves and as compared to other populations, with regard to race, diet, and cultural factors and are expected to have different characteristics to those of western patients, but few studies have been conducted in this regard. We evaluated the epidemiological and physiological characteristics of patients with constipation who visited a tertiary referral center. METHODS: A total of 338 patients with constipation were included. They completed a questionnaire and took physiological tests such as defecography, colon transit time, and anorectal manometry. We classified the types of constipation according to the physiological tests and analyzed the results. RESULTS: The mean age of the study patients was 53.8 +/- 16.3 years and 42.3% of the patients were > or = 60 years old. Patients who had tried folk remedies reached 64.3%. Among the self-reported patients with constipation, 89.1% satisfied the Rome III criteria for constipation. However, 84% of the patients who did not satisfy the criteria showed abnormal results on the physiological tests. Patients with normal transit constipation, slow transit constipation, and dyssynergic defecation were 21%, 27%, and 29% of the all patients, respectively. Rectal hyposensitivity was found in 16.9% of patients and 25% of them revealed anatomic abnormalities on defecography. CONCLUSIONS: Korean patients with constipation have a tendency to delay an accurate diagnosis and treatment and to use folk remedies. As physiological tests for patients with constipation who visited a tertiary hospital showed a relatively high rate of abnormal results, such as dyssynergic defecation and anatomic problems, active physiological evaluations should be considered for such patients.

A presença de retocele interfere nos resultados de exames de fisiologia anal? / Rectocele influences results of anal physiological examinations?

INTRODUÇÃO: A retocele é causa comum de constipação por defecação obstruída. Freqüentemente está relacionada com outras causas de defecação obstruída, e os exames de fisiologia anal são importantes para o diagnóstico preciso da causa de constipação intestinal. OBJETIVO: observar a influência da retocele nos exames de fisiologia anal, e a necessidade da realização desses após o diagnóstico da retocele. MÉTODO: Para este trabalho foram estudados 40 pacientes com diagnóstico de defecação obstruída. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos aos exames de manometria, sensibilidade retal, eletromiografia, latência do nervo pudendo e proctografia, e foram separados em 2 grupos: portadores e não portadores de retocele . Foram encontrados 18 pacientes com retocele, e o diagnóstico mais freqüentemente associado foi o anismus . Em relação aos exames foi encontrada diferença significante apenas na proctografia no ângulo ano retal, demonstrando que a presença de retocele não interferiu nos resultados de exames de fisiologia anal quando comparados com outros constipados, mas esteve associada a outras causas de constipação, como anismus que necessita de outro tipo de tratamento. CONCLUSÃO: A retocele não interferiu nos valores dos exames de fisiologia anal, mas esteve associada a outros diagnósticos, sendo importante a realização dos mesmos.

INTRODUCTION: Rectocele is a common cause of constipation for obstructed defecation. It often is related with other causes of outlet obstruction and the examinations of anal physiology tests are important for necessary diagnosis of the constipation cause. OBJECTIVE: To observe the influence of rectocele in the anal physiology tests and the necessity of its accomplishment to the diagnosis of rectocele. METHOD: In this study, 40 patients with diagnosis of outlet obstruction had been analyzed. All the patients had been submitted to manometry, rectal sensitivity, electromyography, pudendal nerve latency and proctography and they had been separated in 2 groups: carriers and non-carriers of rectocele. 18 patients with rectocele had been found and the diagnosis often associated was anismus. In relation to the examination there was significant difference only in the proctography in the rectal angle, demonstrating that the presence of rectocele did not intervene with the results of the examination of anal physiology when compared with the other constipated, but it was associated with other causes of constipation such as anismus that needs another type of treatment. CONCLUSÃO: Rectocele did not intervene with the values of the examination of anal physiology, but it was associated with other diagnosis, therefore it is important the accomplishment of the examination.